Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Posttransplant thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is classified as de novo or recurrent, with distinct triggers and management implications for kidney transplant recipients. This review provides an etiology-based framework for de novo TMA and the current approach to diagnosis, pretransplant risk assessment, and management of recurrent complement-mediated TMA (atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome). RECENT FINDINGS: Complement alternative pathway dysregulation underlies both de novo and recurrent posttransplant TMA, with pathogenic variants in complement regulatory proteins-factor H, complement regulatory proteins-factor I, and membrane cofactor protein identified in a substantial minority of affected recipients and increasingly sought as a second hit alongside calcineurin inhibitor exposure, antibody-mediated rejection, infection, and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Eculizumab, and increasingly ravulizumab, have transformed outcomes in complement-mediated disease, with growing evidence supporting pretransplant prophylactic use in high-recurrence-risk genotypes and protocol-based alternatives in lower-risk settings. SUMMARY: A systematic, etiology-directed approach-addressing reversible triggers, excluding rejection and infection, and reserving complement blockade for complement-mediated or refractory disease-remains central to managing posttransplant TMA, though randomized trial data to guide optimal prophylactic strategy remain limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chutani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: