Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this work, sorption-enhanced reforming (SER) and sorption-enhanced autothermal reforming (SE-ATR) were investigated for hydrogen production from synthetic and real olive mill wastewater (OMW) and real distillery wastewater (DW), for the first time; materials employed included a previously reported Ni–Rh catalyst supported on a hydrotalcite-derived material, promoted with La, and a commercial CaO as CO 2 -selective sorbent. Basic characterization of the catalyst revealed, through temperature-programmed reduction with H 2 (TPR – H 2 ), the reduction temperature of 750 °C. Sorption test results showed a CaO CO 2 sorption capacity of ∼2.0 mmol CO 2 ·g sorb -1 under dry conditions at 500 ℃ and p CO2 = 0.048 bar, increasing to ∼8.5 mmol CO 2 ·g sorb -1 in the presence of steam at 500 ℃ with p CO2 = 0.007 bar and p H 2 O = 0.855 bar. In the SER experiments at 500 °C, pre-breakthrough H 2 yields reached 10.85 mol H 2 ·mol OMW -1 with H 2 purities close to 99%, while the SE-ATR achieved lower yields (∼6.4 mol H 2 ·mol OMW -1 ) but improved thermal efficiency and reduced coke formation. Over four sorption-desorption cycles, sorbent capacity decreased to 58.6% of its initial value for the SE-ATR, which was attributed to sintering of the CaO sorbent. Tests with real OMW and DW achieved total organic carbon (TOC) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removals above 98% and 99%, respectively, with total phenolic content (TPH) removal exceeding 95%. The reaction condensate of the real effluents, had a sufficiently low organic load to be discarded, according to EU regulation. These results demonstrated the potential of the SER and the SE-ATR for simultaneous renewable hydrogen production and wastewater treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cerqueira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: