Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, CFD has shown it can effectively explore and fine-tune how rotors work under different conditions. Although they are dependable, the old-fashioned experimental methods can be kind of costly and oftentimes, long. Thus, this work involves a comparative CFD study to validate the thermodynamic properties and flow characteristics of various rotor profiles with a constant clearance of 0.15 mm, with a focus on flow dynamics and sealing characteristics. The study examines the variations of temperature, velocity and pressure within the rotor geometry. There are four modified profiles (Profiles 1 - 4) looked at, and the Master Rotor is essentially the reference profile or the baseline. The velocity and temperature readings under very high pressure, velocity, and temperature readings show that Profile 1 performs better than the others, thus indicating better sealing and less restrictive flow passages. Leakage (or a sort of flow separation) occurs in Profiles 2, 3 and 4, with the performance remaining in the middle to poor. Overall, Rotor Profile 1 is the best design that fits within the limits and is a good choice for applications that are more demanding, particularly if the manufacturing tolerances can consistently be maintained to keep this 0.15 mm clearance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shinde et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: