Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To discover computational mechanisms of cognition, models typically specify a fixed psychological architecture, treating individual differences as variations within a predefined parameterization. Here, we take a different approach by using the population structure of individual differences to directly drive model discovery. We develop a low-rank neural network that uses this `population geometry' to learn shared computational components and participant-specific weights from trial-level choices, allowing cross-subject variation to constrain the model's architecture. Applied to perceptual decision-making in the Bernoulli Clicks Task across primary and replication datasets, out-of-sample prediction reveals a six-dimensional representation for individual differences: two continuous dimensions of temporal evidence weighting and two of choice-outcome history dependence, alongside participant-specific side bias and signal-to-noise ratio. This low-dimensional organization replicated in an independent dataset. Together, these findings reveal that seemingly disparate decision heuristics reflect different weightings over a small set of shared computational components, and establish a principled methodology for using behavioral variability to discover the mechanistic architecture of cognition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xue et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: