Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper reconstructs the Einstein-gravity branch of Faulkner and colleagues’ derivation of linearized gravity from the entanglement first law within Shadow Theory’s source–readout architecture. A single bulk metric perturbation supplies two readouts for each boundary ball: the first variation of its extremal surface area and the variation of its asymptotic gravitational charge. Their difference is a weighted integral of the linearized Einstein residual. The paper derives this identity by covariant phase space and checks it independently using the scalar-curvature variation on a time-symmetric slice. The paper determines what different families of boundary balls can recover. All centres and radii on one time slice determine the Hamiltonian constraint on that slice. A finite family of suitably chosen Lorentz frames, using all time slices in each frame and the Bianchi and boundary Ward identities, recovers the full linearized Einstein equation. Explicit non-gauge perturbations invisible to fixed-frame readouts show why recovering the field equation and reconstructing the metric are distinct problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeremy Rodgers (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: