Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
V2X-enabled automated vehicles navigating obstructed hazards create a human-system “perception gap,” potentially triggering unsafe driver interventions. This study examined the prefrontal neural correlates of intervention and trust during simulated perception-gap scenarios. We analyzed 231 trials from 31 drivers navigating 8 obstructed hazards under partial automation. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) features across six frontotemporal regions were evaluated using generalized estimating equations. Behaviorally, higher trust predicted lower intervention probability. Neurally, results revealed a timing–amplitude dissociation: prolonged hemodynamic timings correlated with lower intervention odds and higher trust. Conversely, amplified HbR troughs and higher mean HbO/HbT activity predicted higher intervention odds, while lower HbR trough amplitudes aligned with higher trust. These neurophysiological insights offer a foundation for adaptive human-machine interfaces designed to dynamically calibrate trust and mitigate unwarranted takeovers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
吴卓浩 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: