Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: This study aimed to examine changes in dribbling perfor-mance following zig-zag run and shuttle run training and to compare the improvements between the two training groups. Methods: This quantitative study employed a two-group pretest-posttest experi-mental design involving 20 youth soccer players aged 15 years from SSB Putra Galaxy Rembang. The participants were divided equally into two groups (n = 10 per group). The intervention consisted of 12 training sessions conducted three times per week. Dribbling perfor-mance was assessed before and after the intervention, and the data were analyzed using paired-samples and in-dependent-samples t-tests. Results: Both the zig-zag run and shuttle run groups showed statistically significant improvements in dribbling performance (p < 0.001 for both groups). However, the difference in improvement be-tween the groups was not statistically significant (t(18) = 1.892, p = 0.075). Conclusion: Both zig-zag run and shuttle run training were associated with significant improvements in dribbling performance. However, neither method demonstrated a statistically significant ad-vantage over the other.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fauzi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: