Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article develops the concept of mystical neutralization through a case study of Rabbi Eliezer Berland, a Hasidic leader whose authority persists despite criminal convictions. Drawing on apologetic, polemical, legal, and audiovisual materials, we identify four techniques: redemptive transgression, mystical exemption, hermeneutical sovereignty, and vicarious suffering. These techniques shift the claimed authority to judge wrongdoing from human institutions to a divine order. The leader’s presumed spiritual status is invoked to claim “ontological immunity” from blame. The analysis extends neutralization theory by showing how esoteric conceptions of personhood, authority, and redemption can sustain charismatic authority despite criminal convictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: