Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
:The piston-cylinder kinematic pair is a critical mechanical joint widely used in internal combustion engines, hydraulic presses, and dampers. This study investigates friction fluctuations and their mechanism in the kinematic pair. A counterintuitive phenomenon was observed: under oil lubrication, the friction coefficient fluctuates between 0.1–0.9, significantly exceeding the 0.15–0.22 range under dry friction conditions. To explain this, we propose a mechanistic model where surface asperities induce lateral coupled motion during axial piston movement; lateral fluid damping forces resist this motion, converting into additional fluctuating normal force on the piston, thereby causing friction fluctuations. Using the cylinder surface roughness, piston axial velocity, and fluid-simulated lateral damping forces for calculation, it was numerically confirmed that the fluctuation magnitude predicted by the model matches the experimental data. Four corollaries derive from this model: lower lubricant viscosity reduces fluctuations; reduced axial velocity decreases fluctuations; higher nominal normal force diminishes equivalent nominal friction coefficient fluctuations; reduced surface roughness decreases fluctuations. Experimental verification supported all corollaries. Based on this mechanism, piston geometry was optimized to minimize lateral damping forces under lubrication, achieving stable-friction piston-cylinder kinematic pairs that reached the friction coefficient fluctuation level of dry friction (0.15–0.22) in the silicone oil environment. This work provides a theoretical foundation for designing friction-stable mechanical systems. Of course, it must be mentioned that the proposed mechanistic model has not been directly verified by experiments, but only indirectly validated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: