Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: Paired digit stimuli can effectively measure speech recognition threshold (SRT) in typically developing English-speaking children and in adults who are learning English as an additional language (EAL). We evaluated paired digits (digit SRT [D-SRT]) and pediatric words (word SRT [W-SRT]) for determining SRT in children with EAL backgrounds and children with language disorders (LDs) compared to a control group of typically developing, monolingual English-speaking children. SRT efficacy was assessed by comparison to pure-tone average (PTA) thresholds. METHOD: = 74) were normal-hearing children, with a mean age of 7 years, in three groups. Sixteen children had LD; 21 were from EAL backgrounds; and 37 were age- and gender-matched, typically developing, monolingual English-speaking peers. Experimental sessions included the audiometric protocol and speech-language assessments. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant group differences for PTA and W-SRT thresholds; however, mean D-SRT was significantly higher (poorer) in children with LD compared to the EAL and control groups. For EAL children, D-SRT was correlated with PTA and W-SRT with excellent predictive value. D-SRT reliably measured the hearing threshold for speech in EAL and typically developing, monolingual English-speaking children; however, for children with LD, PTA and W-SRT revealed the strongest correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Digit pairs were effective in measuring SRT in both EAL and typically developing, monolingual English-speaking children. D-SRT, therefore, can fill a need for audiologists serving children with limited English familiarity. In children with LD, however, popular pediatric word stimuli produced a closer match to PTA than digit pairs, highlighting the predictive nature of popular pediatric words for English speakers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramkissoon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: