Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Missing integers in partitions have been studied by many authors. A missing integer of a partition is a positive integer smaller than its largest part that does not occur as a part. We investigate parity biases for the number of missing integers in partitions and overpartitions. For every integer c≥2, we prove that the coefficients ac(n) of (-cq;q)_∞/(-q;q)_∞ are eventually strictly positive and provide an effectively computable threshold. The proof uses the circle method, combining a saddle-point analysis on the major arc with explicit uniform estimates on the minor arcs. Specializing to $c=2$ and $c=3$, and verifying the remaining finite cases, we show that partitions and overpartitions of n with an even number of missing integers outnumber those with an odd number for $n>34$ and $n>27$, respectively. We further prove that, for $n>10$, the difference between the numbers of ordinary partitions with an even and an odd number of missing integers is smaller than the number of partitions of n into distinct parts. These results confirm three conjectures of Bhoria, Eyyunni and Santra. We also give a combinatorial interpretation of ac(n) for every integer c≥4 in terms of colored partitions, generalizing the partition and overpartition interpretations of Bhoria, Eyyunni and Santra for $c=2$ and $c=3$, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Du et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: