Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Understanding how individual training observations influence model predictions is important for developing reliable and interpretable data-driven transportation systems. Existing influence-function methods, however, are primarily formulated for unconstrained learning and do not explicitly account for physical constraints that couple different components of a transportation network. Under such constraints, perturbing a training observation can affect model parameters and predictions only through physically feasible directions, potentially changing how its influence propagates across the network. This paper develops a hard physics-informed influence-function framework for constrained learning, in which training-data influence is characterized within the physically feasible space defined by network constraints. The analytical results reveal how physical constraints alter the magnitude, direction, and spatial distribution of training-sample influence relative to conventional influence measures. Using traffic prediction under flow-conservation constraints as a case study, we show that influential observations identified by the proposed framework differ systematically from those identified by classical influence functions. Through orthogonal decomposition, we quantitatively characterize how much of a perturbation in the training data is propagated through the network via the flow-conservation constraints and how much is removed by the constraint projection. The proposed influence framework provides a physically consistent approach for evaluating training-data influence in constrained transportation learning problems, with potential applications to data diagnostics, sensor evaluation, and targeted data collection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Attari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: