Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper examines Hegel's critique of the “goodness of the will” and its relation to Friedrich Schlegel's concept of ironic consciousness, using Friedrich Jacobi's work as a comparative lens. Drawing on Remarks (d) and (f) to §140 of the Philosophy of Right and on the figure of Conscience (Gewissen) in the Phenomenology of Spirit, the article traces the conceptual progression from goodness of the will through subjective conviction to romantic irony. Hegel criticizes the “goodness of the will” for prioritizing subjective intentions over objective ethical norms, a view he sees echoed in Jacobi's notion of the “moral genius” as expounded in the novel Woldemar. While Schlegel agrees with Hegel's critique of Jacobi's emphasis on subjective certainty, he diverges by embracing the consequence that Jacobi called “nihilism”: the impossibility of an ultimate foundation for ethical and legal norms, which, though objective, are historical in their validity. The paper shows that ironic consciousness, as represented by Schlegel, constitutes the highest and most explicit form of the subjectivism already present in the goodness of the will. Ultimately, Hegel's analysis reveals the dangers of ethical systems grounded solely in individual subjectivity, devoid of objective ethical frameworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carlos Antonio Martín Alfaro (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: