Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Vitamin D supplementation effects may vary according to receptor genotype and tumor receptor abundance. We examined whether treatment effects differed according to FokI genotype and tumor nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression after surgery for digestive tract cancer. Methods: This exploratory post hoc analysis used data from the double-blind AMATERASU randomized trial (UMIN000001977), which assigned 417 patients with resected stage I–III digestive tract cancers to vitamin D3 (2000 IU/day) or placebo. FokI genotype was determined by sequencing and nuclear VDR expression by immunohistochemistry. Unadjusted Cox analyses were supplemented by pooled treatment-by-subgroup interaction models adjusted for age, sex, and pathological stage, with baseline hazards stratified by tumor site. Results: The joint analysis included 359 patients (213 vitamin D; 146 placebo). VDR expression varied across tumor sites. Among patients with the FokI CC genotype and VDR expression in quintiles 2–5 (n = 110), the unadjusted treatment hazard ratio (HR) for relapse or death was 0.30 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12–0.73), compared with 1.02 (95% CI, 0.61–1.71) in the complementary subgroup (n = 249; nominal interaction p = 0.02). After adjustment, the HR in the CC/VDR Q2–5 subgroup was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.18–1.10; interaction p = 0.211). For all-cause mortality, the adjusted HR was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.14–1.51; interaction p = 0.135). Conclusions: The unadjusted exploratory findings were attenuated after accounting for clinicopathological factors. Differential supplementation benefit according to the joint classification was not established. Independent validation is required before clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsushima et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: