Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines how institutional conditions shape the vulnerability of countries to illicit trade, focusing on state fragility, corruption, regulatory weaknesses and governance failures. Drawing on cross-national evidence, it highlights how weak institutions can create opportunities for illicit activities to emerge, persist and expand. The study distinguishes between regulatory gaps arising from limited institutional capacity and those sustained through deliberate practices such as selective enforcement and state capture. It argues that illicit trade cannot be explained by institutional weaknesses alone, as these interact with broader economic, political and transnational dynamics. The findings underscore the importance of institutional resilience, accountability, effective regulation and international cooperation in addressing the conditions that enable illicit markets to flourish.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Irrera et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: