Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research note presents a conditional proof candidate for a volume-uniform lower bound on the excitation gap of a fixed-spacing, one-dimensional, periodic two-row SU(2) lattice gauge ladder. It derives an explicit candidate strong-coupling threshold and coefficient from stated activity, polymer-counting, Kotecký–Preiss, tail, and short-period estimates. The claim remains conditional: the polymer bound and count, endpoint argument, operator-domain assumptions, gauge-sector transfer, and matching to the cited perturbation theorem have not received independent mathematical certification; comparison with prior work is incomplete. This is not a certified theorem, not a four-dimensional continuum Yang–Mills result, not a numerical diagonalization at enormous volume, and not a solution of the Yang–Mills existence and mass-gap problem. The note is offered for scrutiny and correction. A locally run language model assisted with exploratory arithmetic and organization; its output was not treated as proof or independent evidence. No external mathematical review has certified this note.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amit Chai (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: