Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Inclusive STEM education places distinct demands on prospective chemistry teachers, owing to the discipline’s high cognitive load, the need to organize practice-oriented activities safely, and the requirement to ensure fair assessment in the context of diverse learners’ educational needs. The present study examined changes in inclusive chemistry teaching competence during a semester-long intervention grounded in Universal Design for Learning (UDL). A single-group pretest-posttest intervention design was implemented in the General Chemistry course (6 credits; 180 academic hours) at Zhanibekov University. The sample comprised 106 first-year university students. Over a 15-week semester, the UDL approach was embedded into the course through a sequence of design-based assignments targeting multiple means of engagement, representation, and action and expression. The course instructor served as the intervention implementer (teacher effect). Data collection included pre- and post-measures using self-report scales (knowledge, self-efficacy, attitudes, and intention to implement UDL), a case-based knowledge test, and the evaluation of student-generated pedagogical artifacts at two time points (T1 and T2) using a study-specific eight-criterion UDL design rubric (0–3 per criterion; total score 0–24). Data were analyzed using paired pre-post comparisons, effect size estimation, and correlational and regression analyses based on change scores. Significant pre-post improvements were observed in several competence indicators, with particularly pronounced changes in applied knowledge, self-efficacy, and pedagogical artifact quality. Because the study did not include a comparison group, these findings should be interpreted as competence development observed during participation in a UDL-integrated General Chemistry course rather than as evidence of a causal UDL effect. The results nevertheless support further controlled investigation of UDL as a discipline-specific model for inclusive chemistry teacher preparation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tulegenova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: