Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aims . We aim to constrain the dynamical masses of the four confirmed transiting planets orbiting the infant (20 ± 10 Myr) star V1298 Tau (orbital periods P b ∼ 24.1 d, P c ∼ 8.2 d, P d ∼ 12.4 d, and P e ∼ 48.7 d), through a new analysis of a homogeneous radial-velocity dataset. This system is a key benchmark for testing formation and early-stage evolutionary models of planets. Methods . We analysed more than 380 high-resolution spectra collected with the HARPS-N spectrograph over a time span of 4.5 yr. To account for dominant stellar activity and transit-timing-derived planet–planet interactions, we analysed radial velocities extracted using two different approaches and combined N -body simulations with multi-dimensional Gaussian-process regression. We tested a set of spectroscopic and photometric activity diagnostics to mitigate the variability due to the stellar magnetic activity in the radial-velocity time series. Results . The mass determinations are sensitive to the choice of the radial-velocity extraction method and activity diagnostics. For some specific models, we measured masses with a significance of 3.5–4 σ for planets b (0.52 −0.14 +0.12 , 0.65 −0.18 +0.21 , 0.67 −0.19 +0.16 , and 0.78 −0.20 +0.19 M Jup ) and e (0.40 −0.13 +0.14 , 0.66 −0.18 +0.17 , and 0.71 −0.22 +0.18 M Jup ). These values are compatible with masses of giant planets and are notably higher than those recently derived from transit timing variations alone, which indicate that these are low-density ‘super-puffy’ planets. Injection-and-recovery simulations moderately support this conclusion for planet b. For planets c and d, we primarily provide updated upper mass limits. Conclusions . Our analysis represents an exploratory study to address the complex issue of mass measurement in a multi-planetary system characterised by high levels of stellar activity. While firm conclusions cannot be drawn for V1298 Tau, in a few cases our results leave open the possibility that planet b in particular is a massive giant rather than a sub-Neptune progenitor. This dichotomy may be solved by combining radial velocities and transit time variations in a more complex photo-dynamical modelling, with a larger sample of transits than currently available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Damasso et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: