Key result
Advanced maternal resuscitation strategies support survival after obstetric cardiac arrest across 31 studies.
Why the study?
Although management of obstetric cardiac arrest has evolved over the past two decades, relevant evidence for advanced maternal-fetal resuscitation strategies remains scattered across multiple disciplines and is rarely evaluated as a single continuum of care.
Do advanced maternal-fetal resuscitation strategies (resuscitative hysterotomy, ECPR/VA-ECMO, REBOA, and damage-control hemostatic resuscitation) improve survival in patients with obstetric cardiac arrest?
Systematic Review
Do advanced maternal-fetal resuscitation strategies (resuscitative hysterotomy, ECPR/VA-ECMO, REBOA, and damage-control hemostatic resuscitation) improve survival in patients with obstetric cardiac arrest?
This systematic review synthesizes 31 studies on obstetric cardiac arrest, reinforcing pregnancy-specific CPR and timely resuscitative hysterotomy as core interventions while highlighting emerging roles for ECPR/VA-ECMO, REBOA, and early hemostatic resuscitation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Outcomes vary widely by resuscitation strategy in case-based data; leaves open optimal sequencing of resuscitative delivery and ECPR.
Obstetric cardiac arrest is uncommon; however, when it occurs, the consequences are immediate and often devastating for both the mother and fetus. Management has evolved considerably over the past two decades, although the relevant evidence remains scattered across several disciplines and is rarely considered as a single continuum of care. This systematic review was undertaken to examine the current evidence supporting advanced maternal–fetal resuscitation strategies after obstetric cardiac arrest, with particular attention to resuscitative hysterotomy, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)/venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), and damage-control hemostatic resuscitation. A structured search of major electronic databases was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 recommendations. From 978 records initially identified, 31 studies met the predefined eligibility criteria and were included in the final synthesis. The literature consistently supports rapid pregnancy-specific cardiopulmonary resuscitation and timely resuscitative hysterotomy as core interventions during maternal cardiac arrest. Beyond these measures, emerging evidence indicates a growing role for ECPR/VA-ECMO in selected cases of refractory arrest and for REBOA in severe obstetric hemorrhage accompanied by hemodynamic collapse. Studies evaluating tranexamic acid, fibrinogen replacement, viscoelastic-guided coagulation management, and massive transfusion protocols suggest that early hemostatic optimization may substantially influence survival in hemorrhagic etiologies. At the same time, much of the available evidence is derived from observational studies, small cohorts, and case-based reports, which limits direct comparisons between interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andonotopo et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Obstetric cardiac arrest. Advanced maternal-fetal resuscitation (resuscitative hysterotomy, ECPR/VA-ECMO, REBOA, and damage-control hemostatic resuscitation) was evaluated on Maternal and fetal survival / resuscitation outcomes. Resuscitative hysterotomy, ECPR/VA-ECMO, REBOA, and early hemostatic optimization support survival after obstetric cardiac arrest across 31 synthesized studies.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: