Key result
Correcting LDL-C for Lp(a) shifted 9.7% (95% CI 7.0-13.4%; p<0.001) of patients with suspected familial hypercholesterolemia to a lower DLCN category and reduced probable/definite FH from 22.4% to 18.3%.
Why the study?
Lipoprotein(a) contributes to measured LDL-C, which may affect the clinical classification of familial hypercholesterolemia using Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria.
Does correcting pretreatment LDL-C for the estimated cholesterol content of lipoprotein(a) change the clinical diagnostic classification of familial hypercholesterolemia using Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria in patients referred to a tertiary lipid clinic?
Observational (n=339)
No
Does correcting pretreatment LDL-C for the estimated cholesterol content of lipoprotein(a) change the clinical diagnostic classification of familial hypercholesterolemia using Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria in patients referred to a tertiary lipid clinic?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adjusting pretreatment LDL-C for the estimated cholesterol content of Lp(a) results in a downward reclassification of DLCN familial hypercholesterolemia diagnostic categories in approximately 10% of referred lipid clinic patients, reducing the proportion meeting the threshold for probable or definite FH.
Introduction: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] contributes to measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), potentially affecting the classification of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). This study evaluated how correcting LDL-C for the estimated cholesterol contribution of Lp(a) affects the clinical classification of FH using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study included 339 patients evaluated for suspected FH at a tertiary lipid clinic. Corrected LDL-C was calculated by subtracting the estimated cholesterol content of Lp(a) (30% of Lp(a) mass) from pretreatment LDL-C. DLCN scores, recalculated from source data, and all four DLCN categories were determined before and after correction. Changes across categories were tested with the Bowker test of symmetry, and changes at the DLCN ≥6 and ≥3 thresholds with the McNemar test. Results: LDL-C correction reduced mean LDL-C from 5.02 ± 2.01 to 4.75 ± 2.01 mmol/L (p < 0.001). In total, 33 patients (9.7%; 95% CI 7.0-13.4%) moved to a lower DLCN category, and none moved upward (Bowker test, p < 0.001). The proportion with probable or definite FH (DLCN ≥6) decreased from 22.4% to 18.3%, and that with DLCN ≥3 from 54.3% to 49.0% (both p < 0.001). Conclusion: Correcting LDL-C for the estimated cholesterol contribution of Lp(a) modestly but significantly changed the clinical DLCN classification of patients with suspected FH, shifting approximately one in ten patients into a lower diagnostic category. Without a genetic reference standard, these findings reflect changes in clinical classification, not improved diagnostic accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lukač et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Suspected familial hypercholesterolemia (n=339). Lp(a)-corrected LDL-cholesterol calculation (subtracting 30% of Lp(a) mass) vs. Uncorrected pretreatment LDL-cholesterol was evaluated on Downward reclassification across the four Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) diagnostic categories (95% CI 7.0-13.4, p=<0.001). Correcting LDL-C for Lp(a) shifted 9.7% (95% CI 7.0-13.4%; p<0.001) of patients with suspected familial hypercholesterolemia to a lower DLCN category and reduced probable/definite FH from 22.4% to 18.3%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: