Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education has raised concerns about student well-being, dependency, and skill retention. This study examined the associations between GenAI use, perceived dependency, academic context, burnout risk, and skill retention. A secondary cross-sectional analysis of 50,000 students was conducted using descriptive analysis, machine-learning models, and behavioural clustering. High burnout was reported by 25.0% of students and was most strongly associated with weekly GenAI use, perceived dependency, and exam-related anxiety. A distinct cluster of intensive GenAI users showed a High-burnout rate of 62.3% and lower mean skill retention than the remaining clusters. The binary XGBoost model achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.802, the three-class model achieved a macro F1 score of 0.538, and the skill-retention model explained 13.6% of the variance. The findings suggest that intensive GenAI use and perceived dependency are associated with increased burnout risk, while skill retention reflects a broader combination of behavioural and academic factors, although no causal conclusions can be drawn.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viroslava Kapustynska (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: