Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a structured, multimodal perioperative protocol for infection prevention in Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery and report preliminary outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained single-surgeon database of all IPP procedures performed at two XXXXXX XXXXXX hospitals between January 2017 and December 2025, classified as primary implants, removal and replacement (R/R), or component revisions (CR). Salvage procedures and explantations were excluded. A structured, protocol-driven perioperative antibiotic regimen individualized by procedure type was employed throughout, using a modified no-touch technique, copious antibiotic irrigation, a compressive mummy wrap dressing, and 23-hour inpatient observation. A Jackson-Pratt drain was placed routinely in primary cases and selectively in R/R and revision cases. RESULTS: Of 487 procedures (406 primary, 58 R/R, 23 CR), one surgical site infection occurred (primary implant patient, 0.25%; 1/406), for an overall rate of 0.21% (1/487); no infections occurred in the R/R or CR groups. The infected case was managed with malleable salvage and later uncomplicated replacement. Mean age was 62.5, 63.4, and 65.2 years for primary, R/R, and revision patients, respectively. Comorbidities in the primary group included hypertension (64.5%), hyperlipidemia (60.3%), diabetes (32.3%), HIV (1.0%), and preoperative S. aureus/MRSA colonization (16.5%). CONCLUSIONS: A standardized, multimodal perioperative protocol, including MRSA decolonization, chlorhexidine bathing, antimicrobial prophylaxis, no-touch technique, drain usage, and compressive dressing was associated with a very low infection rate across all procedure types, supporting further evaluation of this approach in broader settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carter et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: