Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Predictions of cancer risk based on genomic data (polygenic risk scores) can stratify a population into different risk groups, allowing risk-tailored cancer screening programs. While such approaches are generally viewed as acceptable, there remain gaps in understanding Australian perceptions to guide implementation of future cancer control programs and policies. This project aimed to explore Australians’ views on using genomic information to tailor cancer screening and how such programs could be implemented. Methods Four focus groups (n = 28) were held using a discussion guide that explored key features at each stage of potential programs: deciding to take the test, completing the test, receiving the results, and the subsequent impact on screening. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify, code and report themes. Results Three central themes emerged: (1) The value of knowing, which reflected motivations to test for personal as well as family and social benefits; (2) Navigating the complexity of genomics, highlighting challenges in understanding potential pre-test information and results; and (3) Trust in testing, providers, and government which influenced program acceptability for the initial genomic testing. Although this trust was not as clear in whether participants would follow subsequent cancer screening recommendations. Conclusion Our study reveals the need for community education and clear communication about genomics-informed risk-tailored cancer screening. Potential screening programs should consider the role of healthcare professionals and ensure they receive appropriate training to meet public needs. Further research should explore potential adherence to risk-tailored screening recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: