Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) face a 2-year reinjury rate approaching 50%, but individualized prediction models that quantify which baseline impairments predict subsequent reinjury within an established CAI cohort remain scarce, and existing prediction models for ankle injury have not assessed sex-related fairness. The aim was to develop and internally validate sex-equitable machine learning (ML) models predicting 2-year ankle reinjury in individuals with CAI, identify the most influential baseline prognostic markers, and audit sex-stratified model performance. Methods One hundred physically active individuals (50 male, 50 female) with CAI (mean age 21.8 ± 2.3 years) were recruited from a university population between February 2017 and February 2018 and prospectively followed for 2 years; 96 (49 male, 47 female) with at least one follow-up response were retained for analysis (41 reinjury events, 43% reinjury rate). Fourteen baseline predictors spanning demographic, anthropometric, injury-history, patient-reported, biomechanical, postural-control, and functional-performance domains were collected. Six algorithms were trained with nested cross-validation: an unpenalized logistic regression baseline and five ML algorithms (Elastic Net, support vector machine, random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM). Predictive contribution of each feature was quantified using Shapley additive explanations and partial-dependence plots. A pre-specified fairness audit compared single global and sex-specific Youden thresholds derived out-of-fold using the equalized-odds gap and disproportionate-impact ratio. Results All algorithms achieved area under the curve (AUC) values above 0.70; Elastic Net was selected as the primary model (AUC = 0.807, 95% CI 0.714–0.893; calibration slope = 1.015). Sex, arch height index, previous sprains, dorsiflexion range of motion, and Biodex Overall Stability Index consistently emerged as the most influential prognostic markers. Within-sex discrimination was comparable between males and females, but a single global threshold produced an equalized-odds gap of 0.384 that was reduced by 57% (to 0.164) through sex-specific thresholding without retraining the model . Conclusions ML models with a fairness-audited threshold strategy predicted 2-year ankle reinjury in individuals with CAI, reducing the equalized-odds gap by 57%, though the disproportionate-impact ratio (0.683) remained below the 0.80 benchmark. External validation is required before clinical deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: