Why the study?
The study was conducted to demonstrate how predictive machine learning methods can be utilized to detect sport injury risk factors in a data-driven manner, find new risk factor hypotheses, and confirm known predictors.
Can machine learning models using 3D motion analysis and physical data predict moderate and severe knee and ankle injuries in young team sport athletes?
Can machine learning models using 3D motion analysis and physical data predict moderate and severe knee and ankle injuries in young team sport athletes?
Machine learning models can consistently detect certain predictive injury risk factors in young athletes, despite having relatively low overall predictive power.
ML may generate hypotheses on youth sport injury risks; leaves open prospective validation before practice adoption.
The purpose of this article is to present how predictive machine learning methods can be utilized for detecting sport injury risk factors in a data-driven manner. The approach can be used for finding new hypotheses for risk factors and confirming the predictive power of previously recognized ones. We used three-dimensional motion analysis and physical data from 314 young basketball and floorball players (48.4% males, 15.72±1.79 yr, 173.34±9.14 cm, 64.65±10.4 kg). Both linear (L1-regularized logistic regression) and non-linear methods (random forest) were used to predict moderate and severe knee and ankle injuries (N=57) during three-year follow-up. Results were confirmed with permutation tests and predictive risk factors detected with Wilcoxon signed-rank-test (p<0.01). Random forest suggested twelve consistent injury predictors and logistic regression twenty. Ten of these were suggested in both models; sex, body mass index, hamstring flexibility, knee joint laxity, medial knee displacement, height, ankle plantar flexion at initial contact, leg press one-repetition max, and knee valgus at initial contact. Cross-validated areas under receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.65 (logistic regression) and 0.63 (random forest). The results highlight the difficulty of predicting future injuries, but also show that even with models having relatively low predictive power, certain predictive injury risk factors can be consistently detected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jauhiainen et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: