Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chronological age may influence how professional soccer players respond to a standardized testing sequence, yet this has rarely been examined within a single session. This secondary analysis included 227 professional male outfield players who contributed data from 243 preseason testing sessions. Squat jump, countermovement jump, and arm-swing countermovement jump tests were performed before isokinetic knee-strength testing and a maximal treadmill cardiopulmonary test and were repeated after only 3 minutes of recovery. Linear mixed-effects models included time, mean-centered age, and their interaction, with random intercepts for player and testing sessions. Countermovement jump increased by 1.91 cm (95% confidence interval: 1.64–2.17; p<0.001), with a significant time×age interaction (B=0.078 cm y−1; 95% confidence interval: 0.028–0.129; p=0.002). A similar interaction was observed for arm-swing countermovement jump (B=0.080 cm y−1; p=0.007), whereas the squat jump estimate was smaller and statistically inconclusive (B=0.027 cm y−1; p=0.291). The countermovement jump interaction remained broadly consistent in post hoc analyses accounting for body fat, relative knee strength, maximal oxygen uptake, and baseline countermovement jump. Older players therefore showed a slightly larger countermovement jump improvement across this demanding sequence. Although the test position was not manipulated, these findings suggest that the placement of the countermovement jump within a testing battery should be kept consistent when repeated jump assessments are compared.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parpa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: