Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to develop transformational models to reform the system of public administration of territorial communities in the post-war period in Ukraine. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study follows a qualitative research design founded on policy research and a cross-country comparison of international governance models to determine the best practices applicable to the Ukrainian context. The purposive, criterion-based sample comprises 12 documents. The data were analysed through thematic analysis along with comparative institutional analysis. Research Limitation: The study provides a conceptual basis for further research on the implementation of post-war public administration reforms at the territorial community level. Findings: The results indicate that a combination of decentralised governance, digital-based administration, participatory community-driven strategies, and European-oriented institutional reforms offers a holistic transformation model. Decentralisation increases territorial capacity, responsiveness, and crisis management. Digital governance enhances transparency, accessibility to services, and reduces corruption. Participatory mechanisms strengthen accountability and rebuild social trust, while consistency with European standards supports institutional harmonisation, international assistance, and long-term development. Practical Implication: The proposed transformation models can be used to reform the system of public administration of territorial communities during Ukraine’s post-war recovery. Social Implication: Implementing these models can strengthen local governance, improve service delivery, and support sustainable community recovery. Originality/Value: The study demonstrates that the integration of decentralised governance, digital administration, participatory approaches, and European-oriented institutional reforms provides a comprehensive model for post-war public administration transformation in Ukraine
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kotov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: