Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of this study is to experimentally investigate the vibro-acoustic behavior of a single-cylinder compression ignition engine fuelled with ternary blends of Ricinus communis L. biodiesel, n-butanol and graphene oxide nanoparticles with special emphasis on the effect of injection timing. Experiments were performed at injection timings of 21°, 23° and 25° bTDC. The vibration velocity of the engine was measured by Laser Doppler Vibrometry and the noise characteristics were evaluated based on sound pressure level measurements. The vibro-acoustic responses of the fuel blends studied were comparatively evaluated at different injection timings. With the injection timing advanced, the diesel vibration velocity was reduced from 0.843 m/s to 0.467 m/s. Among the blends of nanoparticles, the D65B20nB15 + 75 ppm NPs blend produced a minimum vibration velocity of 0.156 m/s at 25° bTDC, which is 81.5% lower than that of diesel at 21° bTDC. The D70B20nB15 blend showed vibration reductions of 22.0%, 19.7% and 66.6% at 21°, 23° and 25° bTDC respectively. The sound pressure levels also decreased from 70.37 dB to 58.33 dB with advanced injection timing. The minimum RMS noise of 54.20 dB was achieved for D65B20nB15 + 75 ppm NPs at 25° bTDC. The results show that the fuel composition combined with the optimization of the injection timing can have a significant influence on the vibration and noise characteristics of the engine. Of the conditions tested, the D65B20nB15 + 75 ppm NPs at 25° bTDC provided the best overall vibro-acoustic response, suggesting it can be used to reduce engine vibration and noise under the experimental conditions studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakella et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: