Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) increasingly appears as unstructured text across social media and open-source security reports, yet its volume and noise make timely, accurate extraction a persistent bottleneck for defenders. We present a multi-stage CTI processing framework that couples domain-specific classification with knowledge-enhanced Named Entity Recognition (NER). A classifier fine-tuned from SecureBERT, a cybersecurity-specific language model, first filters threat-relevant content, achieving 92.41% accuracy and a 93.36% F1-score on a public CTI classification corpus and achieving the highest observed performance for Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and the larger general-domain DeBERTa-Large baselines trained under matched conditions. A knowledge retrieval module then augments candidate text with external context drawn from Wikipedia and Wikidata using three Best Matching 25 (BM25) strategies: sparse Wikipedia retrieval, sparse Wikidata retrieval, and Wikidata entity-attribute lookup. Evaluated on the DNRTI benchmark with a SecureBERT encoder coupled to a Conditional Random Field (CRF) layer, knowledge augmentation raises entity-level F1 from 87.16% (no retrieval) to 93.01%, attaining the highest recall (93.44%) and F1-score among reported methods; the gains are most pronounced for proper-noun entity types such as hacker organisations and affected geographic areas, where external descriptions resolve aliases and ambiguity. We analyse each retrieval strategy, report category-level results, and candidly delineate the framework’s limitations, including the report-versus-tweet domain gap, English-only coverage, and the absence of statistical significance testing. Overall, the study shows that pairing a domain-adapted encoder with lightweight external knowledge retrieval is an effective and computationally economical route to improving CTI extraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: