Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined associations between Vision Umurenge Programme (VUP) participation and multidimensional household welfare in Huye Town, Rwanda, using a comparative cross-sectional survey supported by key-informant interviews and contextual field observations. From approximately 1,040 eligible households, 180 were targeted; 110 valid questionnaires (61.1%) were retained after tracing difficulties, household absence and incomplete returns, comprising 83 beneficiaries and 27 non-beneficiaries. The quantitative analysis used group comparisons, correlation, multiple regression and propensity score matching (PSM); qualitative information assisted interpretation but was not independently quantified. Financial Services access was strongly associated with income-generating activity (IGA) engagement (χ² = 70.17, p < 0.001). In the primary regression, Financial Services (β = 0.635, p < 0.001), household size (β = 0.116, p < 0.001) and education (β = 0.186, p = 0.010) were significant; Direct Support and Public Works were not. Among 26 matched pairs, beneficiary households had higher composite scores (paired t = 2.529, p = 0.018) and productive asset counts (paired t = 2.575, p = 0.016), but not significantly higher income or food consumption scores. These findings indicate associations, not proven programme effects, given the small, uneven groups, possible unobserved confounding and single-time-point data. The findings support strengthening Financial Services access, and testing targeted livelihood and nutrition support; adjustments to wages require separate cost and adequacy evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Habiyaremye et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: