Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protocol, extracted data and analysis code for a systematic review and Bayesian equivalence meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing time-restricted eating (eating window of 10 h or less) with habitual eating during the same resistance training, for fat-free mass, imaging-based muscle size, maximal strength and secondary outcomes. Registration. The review was not prospectively registered. The protocol, with the deviations from it in the conduct of the review (Section 10), is provided in this record. Files. N5_protocol.pdf: review protocol, search strategies and deviations from the protocol. N5_DataS1_extracted_data.xlsx: arm-level extraction, effect sizes, intake, covariates, RoB 2 judgements and all model results (sheet README describes each sheet). N5_analysis_code.zip: R code that reproduces every analysis, supplementary table and figure from Data S1 (R 4.3.3, metafor, clubSandwich, rjags/JAGS 4.3; seed 20261015). Data and protocol: CC BY 4.0. Code: MIT licence (stated in the code README).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muñoz-López et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: