This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Is hydrogen fully derived? Charge the recognition cost J(x) = ½(x + 1/x) − 1 on each link's flux f of the cubic lattice ℤ³, so that a link costs cosh f − 1; the alternative charges it on log-ratios of levels. A point charge c has least-cost flux arsinh ∇μ, whose potential obeys Σ arsinh(μ(n) − μ(n′)) = c δ(n, 0), the sum running over the neighbours n′ of n. At every finite charge μ(n)|n| → c/(4π), with an inverse-square Coulomb field; a class of odd flux laws containing the alternative gives the same far field. With the cost on the flux, charges Q₁ and Q₂ carry the energy Q₁Q₂/(4πr)(1 + o(1)) as r → ∞, without a weak-field limit. This law, or on either law the one-charge field with a test-charge reading, gives the atom's potential −g/r. For −κ∇² − g/r on square-integrable states, bounded at the nucleus and twice continuously differentiable elsewhere, the negative energies are exactly −g²/(4κn²), each with n² independent states and no other bound states there; no square-integrable state has positive energy. Hydrogen is not fully derived: its spectrum's form, with frequency ratios such as Lyman-α : Balmer-α = 27 : 5, rests on J, named readings and one open continuum step, and its scale needs the fine-structure constant and the electron mass. Spin, fine and hyperfine structure, the Lamb shift, nuclear recoil, the zero-energy state and scattering states lie outside it.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan Washburn (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: