Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
How do simple counting budgets constrain completion in finite progression systems? This companion presents exact centre-accounting contracts, an interval bound and supporting polynomial identities, with statement-level mathematical evidence. Saved native certificate admissions and explicit external proof acceptance remain separately labeled; unresolved inputs are retained rather than counted as proved results. These supporting contracts do not establish the open incidence bridge, a density theorem, or upper or asymptotic bounds for progression-free sets. No fresh proof replay or private checker distribution is claimed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Glowalla (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: