This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: This study investigated the capability of several remineralizing agents to enhance the laser fluorescence values of artificially produced enamel caries lesions under in vitro conditions. Methods: Fifty permanent incisors were selected and demineralized to create standardized artificial lesions. Specimens were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 10): untreated control, casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP (Tooth Mousse™)), casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF (MI Paste Plus™)), the gel supplies bioactive forms of calcium, phosphate, and magnesium gel (CaGP (ROCS mineral gel) and NaF varnish. Laser fluorescence values (DIAGNOdent®) were recorded at baseline, after demineralization, and following 2- and 6-week remineralization periods. Statistical analyses included descriptive tests, the Friedman test, and the Kruskal–Wallis test (p<0.050). Results: Reduction in laser fluorescence values of NaF group was significantly lower than all other study groups (p<0.050). Remineralization at the 2nd week was significantly correlated with baseline (r=0.416; p<0.050) and demineralization (r=0.641; p<0.010). Remineralization at the 6th week was significantly correlated with baseline (r=0.322; p<0.05), demineralization (r=0.561; p<0.010), and application (r=-0.330; p<0.050). Conclusion: CPP-ACP, CPP-ACPF, and CaGP remineralization agents showed higher success in 6th week remineralization compared to NaF. In multivariate analysis, CPP-ACPF and CaGP remineralization agents provide more significant success compared to the others for 6th week remineralization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özüdoğru et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: