Key result
Symptomatic carotid plaques show marked fibroblast depletion and vascular cell-state shifts versus asymptomatic plaques.
Why the study?
Atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability drives ischemic cardiovascular events, yet the cellular and molecular signatures distinguishing symptomatic from asymptomatic human plaques remain poorly defined.
Observational (n=53)
Yes
Single-cell and single-nucleus transcriptomic profiling of human carotid plaques demonstrates that genetic risk and molecular shifts driving symptomatic atherosclerosis reside primarily in vascular wall cells (SMCs, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells) rather than immune cells, nominating TWIST1, GUCY1A1, and MRAS as candidate therapeutic targets.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Provides cellular resolution to plaque vulnerability; extends GWAS loci but remains hypothesis-generating for risk stratification.
Atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability drives ischemic cardiovascular events, yet the cellular and molecular signatures distinguishing symptomatic from asymptomatic human plaques remain poorly defined. Here, we compared 53 symptomatic and asymptomatic human carotid plaques using single-nucleus (snRNA-seq; 17 samples, 19,100 nuclei; AtherOMICS biobank) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq; 36 samples, 68,983 cells; four public datasets), analyzed independently and combined by meta-analysis. Across sequencing approaches, symptomatic plaques showed cell-state shifts toward later or terminal states in osteochondrogenic smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and CD4⁺ T cells, as well as transcriptional changes toward inflammatory and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in endothelial cells (ECs), T cells, and fibroblasts. Nuclear profiling uncovered a depletion of fibroblasts in symptomatic plaques, marked by downregulation of RGS5. Integrating these transcriptomic signatures with genome-wide association data for coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral atherosclerotic disease, we found that genetic risk was enriched primarily in vascular wall cells (SMCs, fibroblasts, ECs), rather than immune cell types. The analyses further nominated higher TWIST1 expression in ECs (colocalized with risk across four atherosclerotic phenotypes), lower GUCY1A1 expression in fibroblasts and macrophages, and higher MRAS expression in T cells as candidate driver mechanisms linking genetic risk to symptomatic plaque transition. These findings provide novel insights into cellular and molecular phenotypes associated with plaque vulnerability and identify potential driver mechanisms of symptomatic plaque transformation that could inform therapeutic development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ray et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis (n=53). Symptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaques vs. Asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaques was evaluated on Cellular and molecular transcriptomic signatures and cell-state shifts. Symptomatic carotid plaques across 53 samples (88,083 cells/nuclei) exhibited fibroblast depletion (downregulated RGS5), terminal SMC/T-cell shifts, and genetic risk enriched in vascular wall cells.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: