Key result
Biatrial pacing cuts postoperative AF ~55% after cardiac surgery compared with no pacing.
Why the study?
Multiple atrial pacing strategies have been evaluated to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery, but the optimal pacing site remains uncertain.
Does temporary atrial pacing at specific sites (biatrial, Bachmann bundle, left atrial, or right atrial) reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation compared with no pacing or conventional right atrial pacing in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,198)
Randomized clinical trials included
Does temporary atrial pacing at specific sites (biatrial, Bachmann bundle, left atrial, or right atrial) reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation compared with no pacing or conventional right atrial pacing in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
In a network meta-analysis of 10 RCTs, biatrial pacing was the highest-ranked and only temporary atrial pacing strategy that significantly reduced postoperative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery compared with no pacing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Biatrial pacing should be considered to prevent postoperative AF after cardiac surgery; confirms benefit in Level 1 meta-analysis.
Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) remains the most common arrhythmic complication following cardiac surgery and is associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and higher healthcare costs. Multiple atrial pacing strategies have been evaluated for POAF prevention, but the optimal pacing site remains uncertain. Hypothesis: Atrial pacing strategies that promote more synchronous atrial activation reduce the incidence of POAF compared with conventional right atrial pacing (RAP) or no pacing. Methods: We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating temporary atrial pacing for POAF prevention after cardiac surgery using the netmeta package in R (version 4.3.3). Interventions included biatrial pacing (BAP), Bachmann bundle pacing (BBP), left atrial pacing (LAP), RAP, and no pacing (control). The primary outcome was POAF. Treatment effects were estimated using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and interventions were ranked using P-scores. Results: Ten RCTs comprising 1,198 patients were included. Participants had a mean age ranging from 58 to 67 years, with women representing 25% of study population. Most patients underwent CABG, and temporary atrial pacing was maintained for 24 hours to 5 days postoperatively. Compared with no pacing, BAP significantly reduced POAF RR 0.45 (95% CI 0.29-0.70). BBP 0.60 (0.28-1.29), LAP 0.73 (0.42-1.24), and RAP 0.73 (0.49-1.10) showed nonsignificant reductions. Treatment ranking identified BAP as the most effective strategy (P-score 0.916), followed by BBP (0.632), LAP (0.445), RAP (0.437), and control (0.070). Network geometry demonstrated robust connectivity, with most comparisons supported by direct evidence and indirect evidence contributing primarily to BBP-related estimates. Overall network heterogeneity was moderate (I 2 = 48.3%). Conclusions: Biatrial pacing was the highest-ranked and only pacing strategy associated with a statistically significant reduction in POAF following cardiac surgery. Bachmann bundle pacing demonstrated favorable ranking but remains supported by limited evidence. Additional head-to-head trials comparing BAP and BBP are warranted to define the optimal atrial pacing strategy for POAF prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahman et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Postoperative atrial fibrillation prevention following cardiac surgery (n=1,198). Temporary atrial pacing (biatrial pacing [BAP], Bachmann bundle pacing [BBP], left atrial pacing [LAP], right atrial pacing [RAP]) vs. No pacing (control) was evaluated on Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29-0.70). Biatrial pacing significantly reduced postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery compared with no pacing (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.29-0.70; P-score 0.916).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: