Why the study?
This 16th Annual Report from the STS Intermacs registry evaluates contemporary continuous-flow LVAD outcomes from 2015 to 2024, with a focus on patients 65 years and older in the context of stagnant national implant volumes.
Cohort (n=28,029)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“LVAD therapy has come a long way, but persistent complications, frequent readmissions and caregiver strain make the case for the ongoing need for PC for these patients.”
Contemporary fully magnetically levitated LVADs provide over 50% five-year survival even in patients aged 65 and older, supporting broader adoption and updated patient eligibility criteria for durable mechanical circulatory support.
The 16th Annual Report from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (Intermacs) includes 28,029 continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF LVAD) implanted from 2015 to 2024. Survival remains excellent with the fully magnetically levitated CF LVAD (1-year survival: 85.9%, 5-year survival: 60.2%, 7-year survival: 51.8%). Patients also experience a low incidence of adverse events, including freedom from gastrointestinal bleeding (73.5%), device malfunction (81.8%), and stroke (87.1%) at 5 years, reinforcing the effectiveness of contemporary device platforms. However, despite these advancements, national durable LVAD implant volumes have remained stagnant. A focus on the subgroup of patients 65 years and older demonstrates excellent outcomes with respect to survival (1-year survival: 80.6%, 5-year survival: 51.1%), quality of life measures and adverse events. Survival outcomes in this cohort are robust across a wide spectrum of clinical scenarios, including variation in acuity of illness, temporary mechanical circulatory support utilization, and psychosocial risk factors, historically associated with worse outcomes. Several clinical inferences may be drawn from these data. First, the increasingly elusive clinical equipoise between heart transplant listing versus a strategy of durable LVAD support merits an individualized, and value-based approach to therapy in transplant-eligible older adults. Second, the prospect of five-year survival exceeding 50%-even in septuagenarians-is a call to action to revise patient eligibility criteria, close the implementation gap, and realize the full potential of this life-saving therapy.
Journal, society, and media accounts. Useful signal, not independent expert judgment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nayak et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Advanced heart failure requiring durable continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF LVAD) (n=28,029). Fully magnetically levitated continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF LVAD) was evaluated on 5-year survival.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: