Why the study?
Long-term outcomes after LVAD implantation remain heterogeneous, and identifying predictors of mortality, transplantation, and hospitalization is essential to improve post-implant management.
Cohort (n=31)
No
Long-term outcomes in LVAD recipients are driven by post-implant right ventricular failure, renal dysfunction, and significant aortic insufficiency rather than baseline comorbidities, highlighting the need for dynamic post-implant risk stratification.
Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an established therapy for advanced heart failure, yet long–term outcomes remain heterogeneous. Identifying the main predictors of mortality, heart transplantation, and hospitalization is essential to improve post–implant management. Methods We conducted a single–center, retrospective observational study including adult patients who underwent LVAD implantation between 2014 and 2024. Clinical, echocardiographic, laboratory, device–related, and pharmacological data were collected from electronic medical records and follow–up visits. Prognostic associations with mortality, heart transplantation, hospitalizations, and right heart failure (RHF) were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Thirty–one patients (median age 65 years, 93.5% male) were included. Baseline comorbidities and INTERMACS class were not predictive of adverse outcomes. In contrast, chronic kidney disease at implantation emerged as a strong predictor of mortality, heart failure–related hospitalizations, and arrhythmic events. Moderate–to–severe post–implant aortic insufficiency was significantly associated with reduced survival, worse functional status, and increased likelihood of heart transplantation, indicating LVAD failure. Post–implant right ventricular dysfunction was the strongest prognostic determinant: reduced right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC) predicted late RHF, which showed robust associations with mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Among medical therapies, RAAS inhibition was associated with left ventricular reverse remodelling and fewer hospitalizations, while SGLT2 inhibitors correlated with improved functional status. Levosimendan use was strongly associated with late RHF and heart transplantation, reflecting severe hemodynamic instability. Conclusions In LVAD recipients, long–term outcomes are primarily driven by post–implant right ventricular failure, renal dysfunction, and development of significant aortic insufficiency rather than baseline comorbid burden. Late RHF and severe aortic insufficiency represent the most powerful predictors of death and need for transplantation, highlighting the importance of dynamic risk stratification and targeted post–implant management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Arienzo et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Advanced heart failure (n=31). Clinical and echocardiographic risk factors (e.g., chronic kidney disease, aortic insufficiency, right ventricular dysfunction) was evaluated on Prognostic associations with mortality, heart transplantation, hospitalizations, and right heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: