Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To describe implementation and professional appraisal of a shoulder dystocia simulation programme, focusing on perceived preparedness, usefulness and satisfaction. Methods: A descriptive observational study evaluated six activities at a tertiary university hospital in northern Spain (2019-2025), with 130 accumulated attendances and 126 post-training questionnaires, not necessarily unique respondents. Two preparedness questions and 14 unvalidated Likert items were described. Both preparedness responses were collected after attendance; the baseline relied on recall. Historical neonatal outcomes were secondary and exploratory. Results: Questionnaires comprised 93 specialist, 27 midwife and six resident responses. Preparedness was reported in 55/126 questionnaires (43.7%) for the recalled baseline and 113/126 (89.7%) after training. Favourable Likert responses ranged from 87.3% to 100%; overall satisfaction was 98.4%. All midwife attendances occurred in May 2023. Among recorded shoulder dystocia cases, obstetric brachial plexus palsy occurred in 8/78 (10.3%) in 2016-2018 and 13/268 (4.9%) in 2019-2025 (risk ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.20-1.10). Conclusions: Responses show favourable professional appraisal and higher reported preparedness after attendance. They do not establish objective competence, retention or behavioural transfer. Historical clinical differences cannot be attributed to training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernandez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: