Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nanophotonic inverse design requires coordinated choices about geometry, optimization, and electromagnetic simulation. We present an agentic AI framework that combines literature-based reproduction, human-approved optimization strategies, adjoint optimization, and separate forward evaluation of binary candidates. Four metagrating strategies tested from a common initialization yield final diffraction efficiencies of 79.4–90.9%. Selecting by peak optimization objective and by final binary efficiency produces different rankings. A separate metagrating redesign increases diffraction efficiency from 81.2% to 94.6%. For a two-dimensional metalens, the minimum focusing efficiency across three visible wavelengths increases from 40.0% to 65.2% relative to a symmetrized reproduced reference under matched lossless evaluation. A Bayer color router improves mean channel routing from 50.3% to 54.7% under a 125 nm minimum-feature criterion. Separate workflow evaluations include five reproducibility-screening examples, seven literature-to-simulation cases, and repair outcomes across five solver errors. Solver-specific retrieval resolves an interface error left unresolved by every tested standalone configuration. These results demonstrate agent-assisted exploration of nanophotonic designs and show why candidate selection must use the optical performance of the final binary structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: