Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Western biblical exegesis traditionally treats the Old and New Testaments as a closed, two-part dialog, viewing subsequent monotheistic developments through a lens of rupture rather than structural continuity. This paper introduces the "Hermeneutics of Convergence," shifting from an atomized interpretive framework to a macro-historical, global evaluation of scriptural architecture. By executing a text-critical tracking of the "Corporate Son" (the Josephite birthright as distinct from the lineage of Judah), the study explores how the macro-prophetic pattern of exile, death, and national restoration bridges the Hebrew Bible and Christian Gospels directly into the Qur'an as a structural third testament. Ultimately, the paper provides a cohesive blueprint for universal moral scrutiny and radical intercultural reconciliation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Stansfield (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: