Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim: The study aimed to develop and evaluate a data-driven framework integrating material characteristics, process parameters, and in-situ monitoring signals to improve manufacturing failure prediction and identify significant predictive features. Methods: The framework was evaluated using 3,847 manufacturing runs comprising 24 process parameters, 18 material characteristics, and 47 real-time monitoring signals. Z-score standardization and correlation-based feature selection were applied to reduce the number of features from 89 to 73. An ensemble gradient-boosting model with neural feature extraction was used to predict porosity, dimensional changes, and material breaks. Results: The framework achieved a prediction accuracy of 89.1%, an F1-score of 0.868, and an AUC-ROC of 0.937. Adding material characteristics to process parameters improved prediction accuracy from 67.2% to 76.4%. Early prediction accuracies of 74.3% and 82.7% were achieved at 25% and 50% of the process, respectively. Conclusion: Combining process data, material characteristics, and real-time monitoring improves manufacturing defect prediction. The framework has potential to support data-driven process optimization and early quality-risk identification. Recommendation: Further independent and cross-domain validation is required before the framework can be used to modify inspection protocols or deployed in automated factory control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fahim Maksud Shaikh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: