Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Many production AI pipelines call a generative language model for decisions that need no text at all: which queue a ticket belongs to, whether a prompt is a jailbreak attempt, how urgent an email is. The answer arrives after hundreds of milliseconds of token sampling, with a confidence value that is a predicted token rather than a measurement. This paper documents the design, mathematics and measured record of two open alternatives. Laya is a 421M parameter bidirectional decision model that answers typed questions (choice, score, boolean) about a state in one forward pass of roughly 33 ms on a Tesla T4, trained with policy-gradient reinforcement learning whose reward is a strictly proper scoring rule, so that honest probability reporting is the optimum of the objective; it went from plan to public checkpoints and benchmarks in under two days in September 2026. I cover its architecture, training recipe and a compact results record, including an ablation in which a supervised baseline matches the RL objective on single-step questions. The larger share of the paper belongs to Vega, the architecture that followed. Vega freezes an instruction-tuned language model as a reader and trains a dynamical decision engine of 14M to 31M parameters on its hidden states: each option becomes a Gaussian well in a learned 64-dimensional energy landscape, the question drops a particle with an initial position and momentum, a state-space thermostat sets step size and damping, and the answer is read from Boltzmann occupancy along a damped symplectic trajectory. The engine trains in minutes on one GPU, carries conformal sets, abstention and an out-of-distribution flag as fitted artifacts, and in the vega-U form one byte-identical engine serves four readers from 0.8B to 27B, with new readers attached by a closed-form port fit on unlabelled text. All weights, code, harnesses and known failure modes are public.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nandakishor et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: