Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study evaluates the quality of medical doctors in public healthcare institutions through a three-pillar analytical framework comprising physical, intellectual, and psychological capacities, using a case study at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach that integrates a quantitative survey of 200 patients with in-depth interviews of 13 subjects-including hospital administrators and medical doctors-the results indicate that the institution's medical doctors possess professional competence and occupational ethics well-suited to practical requirements. However, under the structural strain of the "University - Hospital" model, the system remains constrained by a high dual-role (concurrent appointment) rate exceeding 84%, a performance-detached compensation mechanism, and limitations in technological infrastructure. The paper proposes strategic solutions toward 2030, emphasizing the overhaul of competency-based evaluation mechanisms, the realignment of workload standards, and the optimization of the workplace environment to facilitate the sustainable development of high-quality healthcare human resources in the public sector.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hường et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: