Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines how corporate governance relates to audit quality, with attention to measurement and institutional context. We combine bibliometric mapping of 784 Web of Science publications (2000–2024) with content analysis of 21 influential studies selected through annualised local citations. HistCite, VOSviewer and Bibliometrix identify publication, citation and network patterns. The qualitative synthesis compares four themes: audit quality foundations, governance demand, financing consequences and reporting behaviour. Auditor characteristics, audit fees and reporting proxies capture different dimensions of audit quality, while ownership, enforcement and informal relationships qualify their interpretation. We develop implications for governance oversight of sustainability reporting and assurance, distinguishing evidence in the reviewed core from established contextual literature. The review contributes an integrated interpretation of audit quality‐corporate governance research and a focused agenda for financial and sustainability‐related accountability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sessa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: