Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Institutional policies for agentic artificial intelligence are only as good as the leaders and structures that must operate them, yet presidents, provosts, deans, and boards receive almost no systematic preparation for AI governance. This conceptual paper defines the institutional layer of agentic AI governance, explains why senior leaders are its least developed actors, and proposes an institutional AI governance capacity model with three layers: individual governance fluency, structural capacity, and adaptive readiness. Development mechanisms, a board-level readiness diagnostic, and the accountability and ethics of governing the governors are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jie Ke (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: