Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study explored the disaster preparedness and response efficacy in flood-prone barangays of Cabanatuan City. It assessed local government units' preparedness, coordination mechanisms, and operational issues in disaster risk reduction and management (DRRM). The study used a quantitative descriptive-evaluative approach to measure readiness in four aspects and to assess the perceived success of disaster response activities. Findings showed strong readiness across all four aspects: Planning and Policies (M = 3.64, Highly Prepared), Resources (M = 3.53, Highly Prepared), Early Warning and Evacuation (M = 3.54, Highly Prepared), and Coordination (M = 3.54, Highly Prepared). Overall perceived success of DRRM execution was graded Very Effective (M= 3.56), reflecting good hazard dissemination, training, rescue operations, and relief provision. However, problems remained in managing evacuation centers, delivering relief supplies, and providing post-disaster support, exposing logistical deficiencies. The survey reveals that respondents regarded barangays as highly prepared and effective in DRRM implementation; however, systemic deficiencies in logistics and coordination remain. To strengthen DRRM, the study recommends policy review, resource optimization, resilient communication technologies, a unified command system, improved evacuation logistics, and institutionalized community engagement. These steps will strengthen governance capacity and promote inclusive disaster resilience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Posadas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: