Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, fuzzing has emerged as a prominent technique for automatically detecting a wide range of security vulnerabilities in cybersecurity. Nevertheless, existing fuzzers remain limited in seed scheduling and energy allocation, as they typically rely on coarse-grained criteria or computationally intensive methods to evaluate seed quality. In this paper, we propose a novel adaptive fuzzing framework, namely TabuFuzz, which aims to prioritize seeds with a higher likelihood of generating interesting variants through mutation and allocate more energy to that seed. Specifically, TabuFuzz utilizes a tabu search (TS) algorithm to model seed scheduling, enabling the precise selection of promising seeds. In addition, we design an adaptive energy allocation strategy that exploits fine-grained dynamic execution information, thereby enhancing overall fuzzing efficiency. We implement TabuFuzz on top of AFL and evaluate it on nine widely-used real-world programs. Across six independent 24-hour trials, TabuFuzz achieved higher observed path exploration and crash discovery than the evaluated baselines on most target programs, with improvements of 19.89% and 160.87% over AFL, respectively. Comparative analyses further show that TabuFuzz recorded higher numbers of paths and crashes than representative fuzzers such as FairFuzz, MOPT, EcoFuzz, and AFL + + under the reported experimental setup.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: