Key result
Athletes with T-wave inversion (n=45) showed no cardiac differences vs those without (n=35), whereas RV ejection fraction ≤45% or >1,000 ventricular extrasystoles/24h indicated ARVC (n=35).
Why the study?
Physiological cardiac adaptation to regular exercise, including biventricular dilation and T-wave inversion (TWI), creates diagnostic overlap with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). This study aimed to assess the accuracy of ARVC diagnostic criteria in athletes with TWI and identify discriminators between physiological remodeling and disease.
Does comprehensive diagnostic testing (ECG, SAECG, echocardiography, CMRI, Holter monitoring, and exercise testing) differentiate between physiological remodeling and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in athletes with T-wave inversion?
Observational (n=115)
Does comprehensive diagnostic testing (ECG, SAECG, echocardiography, CMRI, Holter monitoring, and exercise testing) differentiate between physiological remodeling and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in athletes with T-wave inversion?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Standard ARVC diagnostic criteria are nonspecific in asymptomatic athletes with T-wave inversion and biventricular dilation, but comprehensive testing including CMRI, SAECG, Holter monitoring, and exercise testing can effectively differentiate physiological remodeling from ARVC.
Background Physiological cardiac adaptation to regular exercise, including biventricular dilation and T-wave inversion (TWI), may create diagnostic overlap with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Objectives The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of diagnostic criteria for ARVC when applied to athletes exhibiting electrocardiographic TWI and to identify discriminators between physiology and disease. Methods The study population consisted of athletes with TWI (n = 45), athletes without TWI (n = 35), and ARVC patients (n = 35). Subjects underwent electrocardiography (ECG), signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG), echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI), Holter monitoring, and exercise testing. Results There were no electrical, structural, or functional cardiac differences between athletes exhibiting TWI and athletes without TWI. When athletes were compared with ARVC patients, markers of physiological remodeling included early repolarization, biphasic TWI, voltage criteria for right ventricular (RV) or left ventricular hypertrophy, and symmetrical cardiac enlargement. Indicators of RV pathology included the following: syncope; Q waves or precordial QRS amplitudes <1.8 mV; 3 abnormal SAECG parameters; delayed gadolinium enhancement, RV ejection fraction ≤45%, or wall motion abnormalities at CMRI; >1,000 ventricular extrasystoles (or >500 non-RV outflow tract) per 24 h; and symptoms, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, or attenuated blood pressure response during exercise. Nonspecific parameters included the following: prolonged QRS terminal activation; ≤2 abnormal SAECG parameters; RV dilation without wall motion abnormalities; RV outflow tract ectopy; and exercise-induced T-wave pseudonormalization. Conclusions TWI and balanced biventricular dilation are likely to represent benign manifestations of training in asymptomatic athletes without relevant family history. Diagnostic criteria for ARVC are nonspecific in such individuals. Comprehensive testing using widely available techniques can effectively differentiate borderline cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaidi et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) vs physiological cardiac remodeling in athletes (n=115). Electrocardiographic T-wave inversion in athletes vs. Athletes without T-wave inversion and ARVC patients was evaluated on Differentiation between physiological cardiac remodeling and ARVC using ECG, SAECG, echocardiography, CMRI, Holter monitoring, and exercise testing. Athletes with T-wave inversion (n=45) showed no cardiac differences vs those without (n=35), whereas RV ejection fraction ≤45% or >1,000 ventricular extrasystoles/24h indicated ARVC (n=35).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: