Key result
Use of a 13Fr sheath is linked to lower odds of transvenous lead extraction success.
Why the study?
Fractured or sheared cardiac implantable electronic device leads present a unique challenge in transvenous lead extraction, with clinical failure rates up to 40% and a greater likelihood of retained fragments, motivating characterization of predictors of complete removal and clinical success.
What are the clinical and procedural predictors of complete removal and clinical success in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction for fractured cardiac implantable electronic device leads?
Cohort (n=46)
No
What are the clinical and procedural predictors of complete removal and clinical success in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction for fractured cardiac implantable electronic device leads?
In transvenous extraction of fractured leads, fracture location is the strongest independent predictor of complete removal, while the use of a 13Fr sheath is associated with lower odds of clinical success.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Characterizing fractured lead extractions may inform procedural planning; leaves open validation of predictors in prospective studies.
Introduction Fractured or sheared cardiac implantable electronic device leads presents a unique clinical challenge in transvenous lead extraction. These cases are associated with clinical failure rates of up to 40% and a greater likelihood of retained fragments. The aim of this study was to characterize fractured lead extractions performed at a referral center and identify predictors of complete removal and clinical success. Methods We conducted a retrospective single center study including all consecutive patients who underwent TLE for electrodes fractured before or during extraction between October 2011 and December 2025. Clinical, echocardiographic, and procedural data were collected. Results A total of 46 procedures were analyzed. Mean age was 62.7 years and median lead dwell time was 9.0 years. The most frequent fracture site was the electrode body (67.4%). A rotational mechanical sheath was used in 84.8% of cases (39/46), and femoral snaring was used in 60.8%. Complete extraction occurred in 32.6% whereas clinical success was achieved in 80.4% of patients. Retained fragments > 4 cm were observed in 28.3%. In multivariate analysis, the use of a 13Fr sheath was independently associated with lower odds of clinical success ( p = 0.011). Fracture location was the only consistent independent predictor of complete extraction ( p = 0.031). Femoral access showed a favorable trend but did not reach statistical significance after adjustment. Conclusions In fractured lead extraction, fracture location is the strongest predictor of complete removal, surpassing clinical and procedural variables. These findings highlight the importance of preoperative planning and suggest that femoral access may play a key role in selected complex cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Germán et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Fractured or sheared cardiac implantable electronic device leads undergoing transvenous lead extraction (n=46). Transvenous lead extraction of fractured electrodes (evaluating fracture location and access strategies) was evaluated on Complete extraction and clinical success (p=0.031). Fracture location independently predicted complete extraction (32.6%, p=0.031), while a 13Fr sheath reduced clinical success odds (80.4%, p=0.011).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: